IntroductionRecently, there has been growing interest in approaching destination brand marketing from a psychological perspective, ever since the tourism industry became rated as the second highest source of revenue for economies globally, contributing a total of 8.27 trillion dollars to the global economy in 2017 (Statistica, 2018). Destination marketing managers face some major challenges today as they recognize that what people think about a destination’s image is more important than what a marketer knows about the destination. Another challenge is the intense competition they face from regional and international rivals which share the same customer base, resulting in a particular destination losing its market share to them. The escalating competition requires destination managers of all such tourist destinations to revisit their strategies for destination competitiveness and destination image to overcome competitive challenges (Waseema, 2017). The essay recommends managers with effective destination marketing strategies based on the premise it establishes that cognitive image is more influential than the affective image when promoting a destination image. The essay begins by introducing the image models and presents a review of scholarly literature on the subject comparing and contrasting their findings. Then it argues based on the findings why a cognitive image is preferable and useful than the affective image by discussing the merits of both models. Finally, providing recommendations to marketers in the Maldives based on the cognitive model to influence tourists’ potential travel-related decision-making and choices through successful marketing campaigns and image building based on the cognitive image.Theories and ConceptsIn a tourism context, Images play a vital part in travel destination choices. As services in the tourism industry are often unquantifiable, images sometimes tend to be even more significant than reality. Destination image’s commonly cited definition is “the sum of beliefs, ideas and impressions that a person has a destination” (Mariutti, 2013). In several fields, researchers agree that the image construct includes both affective and cognitive evaluations (Kim Seongseop, 2009). The beliefs or preknowledge about a certain destination evaluates its cognitive image, and the attachment or feelings towards a place evaluates its affective image. The basis is thereby formed from a cognitive evaluation of destination image, on which are built the affective responses later as a function of the cognitive evaluation. The overall image is formed combining the two image evaluations and its unique image that forms as a result of exclusive, original or singular aspects of the destination. The cognitive image is evaluated upon prior knowledge acquisition and information and considered more likely to last longer and generate a stable effect (Kim Seongseop, 2009).Literature ReviewTo study the influences of cognitive images and effective images on tourism and destination image, extensive literature was reviewed to compare and contrast the available studies on the subject. José Manuel (2017) assessed the influence of cultural events, structural elements and place brand on destinations’ overall image results suggesting that affective image does not contribute as much to forming an overall destination image as much as the cognitive image does. It is significant that place brand influenced both the affective image and cognitive image, whereas event brand did not influence destination image much.A central issue in tourism is the image of the destination’s cuisine. WooMi Jo Phillips (2013) looked into American tourists’ plans to visit South Korea and try Korean food, based on the country knowledge and image they have of South Korean cuisine. It seems from the study that cognitive country image indirectly influenced attitudes toward consuming Korean food but the affective image of Korea directly influenced them when it comes to cuisine. Moreover, Seehyung Kim (2008) also suggested that building a destination image is impacted less by the cognitive construct as much as it is by the affective construct. On the other hand, Chun-yang Wang (2010) suggested that overall tourism destination image, in case of China, is echoed by both affective image and cognitive image. It is significant that satisfaction itself has an indirect impact on behavioural intentions.The relationship between cognitive image and destination image on how they influence each other has been investigated by many researchers. Chung-Hsien Lin (2007) examined the role of affective and cognitive components in the construction of destination inclinations in Taiwan from 1,020 residents of Taichung. An important factor was that the affective image itself was impacted by the cognitive image, and because of that, it seems that a significant indirect effect is caused by the destination’s cognitive image on the overall destination image by influencing its affective image. Moreover, Alessandro De Nisco (2015) analyzed the association between, affective and cognitive country image, tourism satisfaction, post-visit intentions, and destination image at the end of tourist Italy visit. It is possible that the presence of important correlations between product images and tourism exist through which cognitive images influence destination image, while affective image possibly leads to post-visit intentions for tourism.Many recent studies have focused on Egypt’s destination image. Omneya M Yacout (2015) examined the role of cultural dimensions and demographics in the choice of information sources on tourism and in the building of a destination image. It can be argued that In forming a cognitive image, the internet’s role in imagining a destination plays a greater role than travel agents. Moreover, the Cognitive image was also considerably connected the three cultural dimensions and demographics. This was further reinforced by Héctor San Martín (2008) when the correlation between the perceived image of a tourist location and psychological factors was found through a study of 807 visitors travelling to a holiday destination. The study’s backing for the effect of psychological factors, i.e. cultural values and motivations, on the image individuals may have before visiting a particular tourist destination is an important factor in understanding the significant effects of the cognitive image.The study of film projection has also become an important aspect of destination image studies. Hyounggon Kim (2003) designed an experiment to evaluate whether the extent of watching a particularly popular film altered affective and cognitive images of the destination it represented, as well as a prior acquaintance with it or increase in interest for visiting it. A positive correlation was found between movies, a form of popular culture, and cognitive destination image. Thus, It can be argued that the cognitive image a film forms can be a significant factor when people choose a destination. Another related issue was photography posted on travel websites that can play an important role. Hany Kim (2015) investigated how photographs taken by Korean and American tourists on a Russian tour that was posted on travel websites, affected travel intentions. It is significant to find from the study that affective hidden characteristics in the photos had a stronger impact than cognitive features on tourists’ plans, but it was also possible that some cognitive elements also created lasting effects.Brand associations have been extensively studied in recent years. Hailin Qu, (2011) proposed that the overall destination image is an arbitrator between tourists’ future behaviours and brand associations such as their recommendations to others or planning to revisit. Another related issue was whether the known predictors of destination image are applicable to residents and tourists and impacts their behavioural intentions (Dimitrios Stylidis, 2017). Using Questionnaires from a sample of 450 tourists and residents in Eilat over a period of 1 year, the findings confirmed the applicability of the model and found the affective component to have been exerting a greater influence than the cognitive on future behaviour in this case. On the other hand, Kirstin Hallmann, (2015) developed a model to study what defines a winter sports destination’s overall image and how intentions to revisit are affected by it. Cognitive image components incorporated in the study influenced sports tourists more in their decision to visit a winter sports destination is an important factor that suggests the possibility of the cognitive image having a deeper impact on destination choice, especially for sports tourists.DiscussionAn overall analysis `of the two main destination image components and a few associative components from the literature studies suggest that despite the importance of affective image in developing likelihood for tourists choosing to visit the particular destination more, it is actually cognitive image building that shapes perceptions to a larger extent. This is supported by several studies reviewed earlier. The pre-image people hold about a destination, is determinant to the willingness to visit the place and recommend it to their family and friends through word of mouth or by posting comments and photos in social media sites. An important factor is recommendations that could effectively motivate other persons to visit the place by attending the event (José Manuel, 2017).The first factor is the perceptions regarding personal safety, good restaurants, suitable accommodation, unique architecture or friendly people, that all depend more on the cognitive image (Seehyung Kim, 2008), and secondly its effect on perceptions of Power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism in a destination that becomes an important factor (Omneya M Yacout, 2015). Moreover, cognitive image building also takes preference because it manages not only to influence destination image individually but a lasting cognitive image also affects affective image evaluation of tourists (Alessandro De Nisco, 2015) (Chun-yang Wang, 2010). Thus, what makes a cognitive image more important in developing by marketers is that people are disposed towards preferring those natural destinations more for which the cognitive image is stronger.On the other hand, however, both affective and cognitive image components affected the preference for developed destinations (Chung-Hsien Lin, 2007), but that only reinforces our view that cognitive image building takes preference. Moreover, the cognitive image is more influential on the overall image, also because of the fact that post-visit image of the place also affects that destination’s cognitive image leading to revisits (Hailin Qu, 2011). Thus, It is more important because the individuals’ beliefs about the destination form the basis of their mental representation of that tourist and relates to the tourist destination’s tangible attributes such as landscape, cultural attractions, and inner well-being, in the mind of the visitor (Héctor San Martín, 2008).Another related issue is the way cognitive image components relate to natural scenic beauty, wildlife habitat, plant life, natural attractions, recreational facilities, healthcare facilities, additional facilities and general visitor management and accommodation. It can be argued that they greatly affect the destination’s cognitive image, according to how the tourists rate the destination and impact their visits more than the affective images (Kirstin Hallmann, 2015). Thus, it is possible that they are more important to be considered in such as situation. Secondly, those tourist images that promote something that is uniquely distinctive in nature or features about a destination have a greater effect on destination cognitive image and therefore important to be highlighted when promoting a destination (Hany Kim, 2015). Thus, it can also be argued that the unique image directly correlates to the cognitive image, strengthening our view that tourists are affected more by cognitive images of destinations.ConclusionsIn a world that is increasingly competitive today, it is crucial for tourist places to distinguish themselves from one another. To do so, they need to be knowledgeable and reflective of their own weaknesses, strengths and needs, and at the same time the environment’s competitive nature, in order to differentiate it from other destinations. Cognitive images have a significantly high impression on the formation of destination image especially on the attractiveness of destination, quality of experience in that destination, and environment and destination value. These determinants must be well-thought-out therefore when creating a tourism policy for these destinationsRecommendationsMarketing efforts to create a strong image for a tourist destination’s promotional campaign must focus on transfer, creation and acceptance of this image. As the Maldives, a popular tourist destination whose economy is completely based off tourism, the destination marketing managers in Maldives hospitality industry can organize cultural events because of tourists at events in smaller, heritage-rich locations, structural or permanent elements that have more influence on the cognitive image. The dominant role of cognitive image in the building of destination image should signal destination managers to the need to preserve local historical heritage, culture, traditions, architecture and historical monuments as unique and differentiating elements. The product material should focus on Maldives’ safety, its cuisine, its accommodation, it shows that the people are tourist friendly and hospitable and the uniqueness of a destination’s architecture. They should also emphasize on tourism service quality and availability of tourism resources.The physical facilities, appearance of personnel, their readiness or willingness of professionals or employees to deliver service or quickly take corrective actions when something unexpected happens, all should be exhibited in the marketing campaigns, along with physical characteristics such as facilities for activities, natural scenery, shopping, and various forms of nightlife or entertainment. Information on different destinations within the Maldives or an event or place taking place within cities should also be easily accessible and readily provided online. A person available in a tourism centre who is easily contactable for information during convenient hours is also quite helpful, as research suggests. Young tourists do not prefer conventional media such as magazines and depend largely upon the Internet, therefore marketing communication that is aiming at young tourists should depend more on interactive media to be able to connect with them more successfully.The role of television shows or films in promoting the Maldives’ destination image should also be considered as they tend to appeal to middle-income tourists and offer them information not available through other media. Specific attention to the country’s impression as a secure and safe environment must also be paid In this regard. Marketing and Branding literature should especially highlight Maldives’ breathtaking scenery through videos and photographs, that should be professionally captured while also promoting those captured by amateur tourists that highlight unique features about the place, as this improves the cognitive destination value. It is possible that due to the diversity of modern tourism, what works for one region may not work for the other, so it is quite helpful to have events incorporating unique elements that distinguish the Maldives from competitor events such as those held in Seychelles, that will strengthen or reinforce the visitor’s link to it.Cultural/historical attractions can develop place attachment through place dependence and place identity. Moreover, the destination marketers’ ability to ensure experiences on-site should at the very least meet, if not surpass, the visitor’s initial expectations also play a large role. Cultural distance is also a factor as individuals confidence in a tourist destination is often more towards places with cultures comparable to their own cultural values. Hence promoters in the Maldives should create specific communications for each group of tourists and segment the market to different tourist types. A more favourable affective image will be achieved for each segment as a result of the tourist destination, thus complementing its cognitive image.ReferencesAlessandro De Nisco, G. M. V. M. M. R. N., 2015. Tourism satisfaction effect on the general country image, destination image, and post-visit intentions. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 21(4), pp. 305-317.Anon., 2012. Antecedents of Tourists’ Loyalty to Mauritius The Role and Influence of Destination Image, Place Attachment, Personal Involvement, and Satisfaction. Journal of Travel Research, 51(3), pp. 342-356.Chung-Hsien Lin, D. B. M. D. L. K. A. J.-S. H., 2007. Examining the Role of Cognitive and Affective Image in Predicting Choice Across Natural, Developed, and Theme-Park Destinations. Journal of Travel Research, Volume 46, pp. 183-194.Chun-yang Wang, M. K. H., 2010. The Relationships of Destination Image, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions: An Integrated Model. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 27(8), pp. 829-843.Dimitrios Stylites, A. S. Y. B., 2017. Testing an integrated destination image model across residents and tourists. Tourism Management, Volume 58, pp. 184-195.Dora Agapito, P. O. d. V. J. d. C. M., 2013. The Cognitive-Affective-Conative Model of Destination Image: A Confirmatory Analysis. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 30(5), pp. 471-481.Hailin Qu, L. H. K. H. H. j. I., 2011. A model of destination branding: Integrating the concepts of the branding and destination image. Tourism Management, 32(3), pp. 465-476.Hany Kim, S. S., 2015. Effect of tourist photographs on attitudes towards the destination. Tourism Management, Volume 49, pp. 29-41.Héctor San Martín, I. A. d. B., 2008. Exploring the cognitive-affective nature of destination image and the role of psychological factors in its formation Author links open overlay panel. Tourism Management, 29(2), pp. 263-277.Hyounggon Kim, S. R., 2003. Motion picture impacts on destination images. Annals of Tourism Research, 30(1), pp. 216-237.José Manuel, H.-M. P. A. D. J. A. F.-F., 2017. The contribution of cultural events to the formation of the cognitive and. Journal of Destination Marketing & Management (, 3(4), pp. 1-9.Kim Seongseop, S. M. H. L., 2009. Tracking tourism destination image perception. Annals of Tourism Research, 36(4), pp. 715-718.Kirstin Hallmann, A. Z. S. M., 2015. Perceived Destination Image: An Image Model for a Winter Sports Destination and Its Effect on Intention to Revisit. Journal of Travel Research, 54(1), pp. 94-106.Mariutti, F. G., 2013. The Image of Brazil as a Tourism Destination: An Exploratory Study of the American Market. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(1), pp. 13-22.Omneya M Yacout, L. I. H., 2015. Use of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions, demographics, and information sources as antecedents to cognitive and affective destination image for Egypt. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 21(1), pp. 37-52.Seehyung Kim, Y. Y., 2008. The Hierarchical Effects of Affective and Cognitive Components on Tourism Destination Image. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 14(2), pp. 1-22.Waseem, M., 2017. Enhancing Destination Competitiveness for a Sustainable Tourism Industry: The Case of Maldives. An International Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(2), pp. 12-24.WooMi Jo Phillips, A. A. K. W., 2013. Investigating the effect of country image and subjective knowledge on attitudes and behaviours: U.S. Upper Midwesterners’ intentions to consume Korean Food and visit Korea. International Journal of Hospitality Management, Volume 32, pp. 49-58.