Eric is 25 years old and has been diagnosed with diabetes for ten years and controls his blood glucose. He coughed for the past two weeks. He feels breathless and now spits out significant yellow mucus. A constant cough can be disturbing to anyone, but as far as people with diabetes are concerned, it complicates things. To start with, a diabetic cannot merely go for cough syrup over the counter since it is possible for it to be strong in sugar. Second, coughing as a outcome of cold exerts extra stress on a diabetic patient, increasing his blood sugar. Thus, treating coughing in people with diabetes involves much more care and consideration. If a cough is the result of an infection, the immune system tries to fight it through distributing substantial amounts of hormones to counter the disease. Although it is effective for patients without diabetes, it can lead to problems for people with diabetes, since these hormones inhibit the action of insulin in the system (Anton Y. Peleg, 2006), regardless if it is normal insulin released by the pancreas or if it is externally received for treatment of diabetes, this hormonal interfering will interact with the insulin to raise glucose levels in the blood. The colour of the phelgm that Eric coughs indicates pathogens that infect his body. If you spit out massive amounts of phlegm, you may have an infection or allergies. Thick, yellowish phlegm is a symptom of bacterial or viral infection, bronchitis, lower respiratory tract illness or sinus infection. The yellow mucus suggests that the immune cells begin to act on the site of the disease, as the white blood cells continue to fight the infection, they are picked up by the mucus, giving it a yellowish hue (C. M. Fletcher, 1959). From the above, it can be diagnosed Eric, who is a type I diabetic, may have symptoms of a chest infection of bronchitis that leads to wet cough producing thick yellow mucus. The two ills that Eric suffers from and their reciprocal interactions have been analysed according to their pathological processes, and appropriate pathological care has been suggested.Analysis of Type 1 Diabetes MellitusAn evaluation of insulin deficiency as a result of loss of function and mass of beta cells is investigated here. The first anomalies of beta cell malfunction, visible before the emergence of illness symptoms, comprise reduction of pulsatile insulin emission and inhibition of first-stage insulin (FPIR) reaction to glucose within arterial circulation. Even before and after the start of symptoms, insulin secretion promptly decreases, and that decrease in its function leads to an increase in liver glucose production and decreased glucose uptake by insulin-sensitive tissues, especially muscles and fats (Chunguang Chen, 2017). The blood sugar level rises and spreads in the urine. Withdrawal of glucose in other tissues triggers the deterioration of structural fats and proteins, resulting in rapid weight loss. In the deficiency of insulin following an umanaged diabetic condition leads to an increased production of acid ketone bodies and results in a metabolic ailment called diabetic ketoacidosis, that is an indication of mismanaged type 1 diabetes mellitus. (Brandt, 1999)Aetiology of Type 1 Diabetes MellitusType 1 diabetes is included in the category of diseases that are known as autoimmune diseases. Autoimmune disorders occur when the immune system mistakenly classifies its beneficial cells as an attacking organism. Genetic predisposition is a critical factor as researchers have discovered some genetic regions closely related to type 1 diabetes. While genetics provides hints as to the reason that some people are more risk prone to type 1 diabetes, but it does not provide explanation the reason why in some people these genes cause type 1 diabetes to develop and why others do not have these genes (Feld, 2002). The researchers suggested that there is possibility for environmental factors to be responsbible for triggering the initial development of type 1 diabetes (McCulloch DK, 1991). Viral infection is also described as a cause, as links have been established between type 1 diabetes and some different viruses. Studies have shown that anti-viruses have been observed at higher rates in pregnant women with other children who develop type 1 diabetes (Christophe M. Farne, 2008). Another advanced theory is that infantile vaccinations might play a role in acquiring type 1 diabetes later in their lives. Some studies suggest that there may be a connection between immunization vaccines such as Hib vaccines, tuberculosis and smallpox, and type 1 diabetes mellitus (Stratton KR, 1994). A compelling indication of the fact that the tuberculosis vaccine is related with a greater occurrence of type 1 diabetes, but other research has also highlighted its contribution to prevention (Massachusetts General Hospital, 2017). Additionally, an association between type 1 diabetes and vitamin D has been established (Kamal as Al-Shoumer, 2015). The researchers found that regions with the highest incidence of type 1 diabetes are usually further from Equator. Research has also shown that those people have a higher occurrence rate of developing type 1 diabetes that have a lower vitamin D content in their system. Another theory enlists cow’s milk to be a cause in developing type 1 diabetes. Research has demonstrated that Introducing cow’s milk at an early age period was linked to higher occurrence of type 1 diabetes (Gottlieb, 2000). They theorized that the reason for the risk could be bovine insulin in cow’s milk. A contributing factor was also an increase in insulin demand. One study found that a diet excessive in glycemic index foods may accelerate the development of type 1 diabetes in infants with signs of self-immunity (Molly M. Lamb, 2008). As children reach adoloscense, the growth phase they go through leads to an increase in the quantitiy of insulin secreted and can cause additional stress on beta cells, which increases the likelihood that the immune system will attack the cells that secrete insulin (Molly M. Lamb, 2015).Epidemiology of Type 1 Diabetes MellitusType 1 diabetes may occur at any time of life, but it usually occurs at the early ages with a greater risk during the puberty phase. Its frequency varies with the highest rates in Northern Europe (CC, 2009). Both genders are risk prone in childhood, but more likely to be affected are men that are at the beginning of adult life (Gale EAM, 2001). The prevalence of type 1 diabetes in children is increasing swiftly in populations everywhere, specially in infants under the age of five, with an expanding period of fewer than two decades in European populations (Podar, 2001). The growing frequency of type 1 diabetes indicates a significant environmental influence in factors leading to growth, whereas viruses have also been attributed as a possible cause, but remains contested. Type 1 diabetes has always been the most common in ethnic populations originating from Europe, though it is increasingly observed to have been progressing in other ethnic groups as well. Populations that are Genetically-related have also demonstrated difference in development: for instance, type 1 diabetes is less common in Icelanders of mainly Norwegian origin than it is in people from Norway, whereas children from Finland are at triple in likelihood to be risk prone than people from Estonia (Podar, 2001). The prevalence of type 1 diabetes rests comparitively lower in ethnicities and populations of non_European origin, though several reports observe an increasing occurrence of disease elsewhere too. The incidence in Kuwait, for instance has become 22.3 out of 100 000 inhabitants. The risk of developing type 1 diabetes peaks at puberty and decreases swiftly after that. In populations of older groups, the classification of type 1 diabetes becomes more problematical. A transnational study on male percentages among infants or teenagers under 15 years of age, found a small surplus of male patients in European residents and people of European descent, whereas a surplus of female patients was observed in the population of Asian and African origin (Karvonen, 1997). On the other hand, a clear male majority emerged in most surveys of people diagnosed with type 1 diabetes appeared between the ages of 15 and 40 (Gale EAM, 2001). There is increasing evidence of increasing incidence since childhood diabetes was an uncommon disease at the beginning of the twentieth century. From the mid-twentieth century, or shortly after that, some populations experienced a resumption of incidence, which continued more or less linearly to this day (Gale EAM, 2001). The present general percentage of upsurge in Europe is around 3-4% each year, while the fastest increase is for children from 0 to 5 (Podar, 2001). However, there are significant intraregional variances, with indications of a swift upsurge in Eastern European regions (Jarosz, 2011). There are also suggestions that the increasing occurrence of diabetes in children may signify a change towards the left side of the starting period, instead of signifying an entire overall increase within a whole population’s likelihood of developing the disease, and this result is consistent with the improved sensitivity of genes under more tolerant environment (EAM, 2005). The increased prevalence within populations of stable genetic makeup indicates environmental influences as possible factors but the specific factors currently being considered do not convincingly explain the possible association (Hermann, 2003).Pathological Processes Type 1 Diabetes MellitusType 1 diabetes is considered as an autoimmune disease and different from type 2 diabetes. It is also known as insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Various immune cells, including macrophages, cell cells (DC), B lymphocytes, Natural Killer Cells (NK), are connected with oxidative stress, inflammation, and other deleterious biological processes that cause damage to pancreatic beta cells (responsible for the Insulin production) (G Mendel, 1989). When the pancreas is injured because of a bacterium, virus, infection, drug, toxin, etc., the immune system does not have enough time to mature and be strong enough to fight the effects. In response to the fact that the pancreas is injured or damaged, the immune system intervenes (as it should) to initiate cell repair and the pancreatic healing process (Aggarwal, 2015). The first phase of the cellular repair process is inflammation as the body needs more blood and other elements to repair and rebuild damaged tissue. During this phase, macrophages are activated as part of the period of inflammation and the process of cellular repair. During this time, macrophages recruit other immune cells to help you. Frequently, after the ignition phase, the cellular repair process changes into the proliferation and remodelling phases. Because immune cells are not healthy enough to fight the virus, infections and other causal factors, immune cells, mainly macrophages, send cytokine signals to recruit more cells to immune T cells, TH1, TH2 and TH17 (Pagliuca et al. , 2014). Depending on the type of infection, TH2 cells can indirectly recruit B cells to cause antibodies; While macrophages can recruit more macrophages and more T cells. The immune system tries to coordinate and balance the immune response between the TH1 and TH2 cells, as well as the TH17 and Treg cells but is unable to do so. In most cases, there are much more TH1 and Th17 cells that create a significant imbalance. Also, toxic T lymphocytes are recruited – their primary task is to kill infected cells. However, if the infected cells pass beta cells, then the TC or not cells begin to destroy the beta cell. Other immune cells, such as macrophages, whose mission is to kill invasive pathogens, attack infected or damaged beta cells, causing a further increase in beta cell death. As the inflammation increases causing more damage, there is an increase in free radicals causing an increase in oxidation, which also causes damage to the beta cells. This creates a vicious circle of inflammation, oxidation, cellular injury and cell death (Atkinson, 2012). As the number of damaged beta cells increases, the amount of insulin production decreases, resulting in a rise in levels of blood glucose. This eventually leads to severe hyperglycemia, which usually goes unnoticed until the person starts to feel very tired and urine a lot, which leads to a doctor’s appointment. With less than 10% of the remaining insulin production, the patient received insulin to bring the blood sugar level back to a reasonable and safe level.Pathophysiological ProcessesAn overview of the between metabolism is provided. The primary organ responsible for circulation of glucose homeostasis in the system is the liver. It does this by storing and absorbing the glucose after meals, and secreting it in precise volumes between meals; Insulin regulates both the functions. The effect of insulin on the liver is controlled by the amplitude, instead of the frequency at which secretory impulses are produced. Moreover, the secreted quantity is regulated by glucose levels and additional fuels in the blood used by the beta cell (Song, 2000). Glucose can be stored in the form of liver glycogen, which is a fast-circulating glucose source. Most of the glucose produced by the liver comes from gluconeogenesis, which also occurs in the renal cortex and helping in producing about 10% of total glucose. High levels of insulin stimulate glycogen development and inhibit glucose production through gluconeogenesis. Glucose production is maintained by the mutual equilibrium between glucagon and insulin; high glucagon and low insulin encourage release of glucose, whereas low glucagon and higher insulin content promote glucose intake. 140 g of glucose each day is usually produced by the liver, of which 40 to 50% is absored by an anaerobic route to carbon dioxide and water through the brain. Glucose mainly provides the energy needed to induce membrane pumps that maintain the nerve memberane’s potential difference (Rui, 2014). Glucose not needed by the brain is expended by other glucose-demanding tissues like brush border of the gut or red blood cells absorbed into tfats suroounding the muscles, influenced by elevated insulin levels. Glucose is phosphorylated in the cell and stored in the form of triacylglycerol in fat cells or glycogen in tissue. The consequences of Insulin deficiency include overproduction of glucose by the liver and decreased inhibition of gluconeogenesis (Wilcox, 2005). Tissues whose glucose carriers are not affected by insulin can still be penetrated by glucose in nervous tissues as well as others, however the entry of glucose into insulin-sensitive tissues like muscles and fats is lessened. Plasma glucose increases and surpasses the capacity of the glucose carrier in the proximal kidney tube to reabsorb glucose before it enters the urine. When glucose crosses the kidney tubes, it presents an osmosis gradient that causes various electrolytes and salts to be lost (Wilcox, 2005). The patient feels more thirst and greater urge to frequently urinate. Even in healthy individuals prolonged fasting can lead to falling Insulin levels thereby causing breakdown of non-essential proteins and lipids that serve as a standby fuel for the body. Insulin scarcity in diabetes produces an accelerated fasting condition and collective loss of fluid and tissue mass results into quick weight loss (Adinortey, 2017). A breakdown of fatty acids in liver mitochondria result into formation of organic Ketone acidic bodies a progression efficiently blocked by insulin in low concentrations. A loss of inhibition of this inhibition can occur as a result of extreme insulin deficiency generating an overproduction of ketone bodies. As a result the metabolic acidosis that happens leads to intense vomiting and nausea, exacerbating the deficiency of electrolytes and fluid through the kidneys. This chain of events results in a severe metabolic disease called diabetic ketoacidosis, an ailment that was considered fatal before the introduction of insulin (Laffel, 1999).Diagnosis of Bronchitis Infections in Eric Acute bronchitis is a medical disease caused by inflammation of the bronchi, trachea and bronchioles. Acute bronchitis is seldom a primary bacterial infection. Indicators of acute bronchitis are typically a productive cough and occasionally subject to severe discomfort through deep coughing or breathing (CC Horner, 2009). In general, the development of acute bronchitis is spontaneously restricted, with broad scarring and a total return to normal function usually observed within 10 to 14 days after beginining of symptoms (Worrall, 2008). Chronic bronchitis is a recurrent a degeneration and inflammation of the bronchi that can be linked with an active contamination. Chronic bronchitis patients have more mucus than usual due to a decrease clearance and an increase in production (Victor Kim, 2013). The mechanism through which excess mucuos is eliminated is coughing. Chronic bronchitis and its prevalence has been complicated by the significant clinical overlap with asthma and the response states of respiratory disease (Rubin, 2014). In adults, chronic bronchitis is defined as daily ejection production for at least three months in 2 consecutive years. Chronic bronchitis is also described as a range of symptoms, the cough that lasts more than a month or a recurrent productive cough that can be associated with wheezing or cracking (Rubin, 2014). In chronic cases, inhalation treatment should be considered. Oral corticosteroids should be added if the coughing persists and the results of the history and clinical investigation suggest a form of asthmatic bronchitis (J Andrew Woods, 2014).Pathophysiology of BronchitisAcute bronchitis causes a cough and phlegm production, which often results from upper respiratory infection. This happens because of the inflammatory reaction of the mucous membranes in the bronchial passages of the lungs. Viruses acting alone or together are responsible for most of these infections (Brodzinski H, 2009) (Miron D, 2010). An airway that suffers from such an insult quickly responds to bronchospasm and cough, followed by inflammation, oedema and mucus production. Mucociliary clearance is an important primary innate defence mechanism that protects the lungs from the harmful effects of inhaled pollutants, allergens and pathogens. (Voynow, 2009). Mucociliary dysfunction is a common feature of the chronic respiratory disease. The mucociliary apparatus consists of 3 functional compartments: the eyelashes, a layer of protective mucus, and a layer of airway fluid (ASL) surfaces that work together to remove inhaled particles from the lungs. The role of exposure to irritants, especially cigarette smoke and airborne particles, in recurrent bronchitis (wheezing) and asthma becomes clearer. Air particles of organic carbon and nitrogen dioxide have been associated with the chronic symptoms of bronchitis in asthmatic children (McConnell R, 2003). Chronic or recurrent insult of the respiratory epithelium, such as recurrent aspiration or repeated viral infection, may contribute to childhood chronic bronchitis (2007). As a result of damage to the mucous membranes of the airways, chronic infections with commonly isolated airway organisms can occur. The most common bacterial agent causing lower respiratory tract infections in children of all ages is streptococcal pneumonia (PURUSHOTHAMA V. Dasaraju, 196). Children with tracheostomy are often colonised by some flora, including alpha-hemolytic streptococci and gamma-hemolytic streptococci. Children who are prone to oropharyngeal aspiration, particularly those with compromised airway protection mechanisms, may be infected with streptococcus orally anaerobic strains. (ml Barnett, 2014)Etiology of BronchitisAcute bronchitis is usually caused by respiratory infections; About 90% are viral, and 10% are bacterial. Chronic bronchitis can be caused by repeated attacks of acute bronchitis, which can weaken and irritate bronchial airways over time and possibly lead to chronic bronchitis. Industrial pollution is also a common cause; The main responsibility, however, is a strong exposure to long-time cigarette smoke. Viral infections are as follows: Adenovirus, Influenza, Influenza, Respiratory Syncytial Virus, Rhinovirus, Human Bocavirus (Bond N, 2008). Coxsackievirus, herpes simplex virus (Schildgen O, 2008). Air pollutants, such as those that occur with tobacco and second-hand smoke, also cause a bronchiolitis incident (Koehoorn M, 2008). One study suggested that the XPC DNA repair gene is associated with the induction of the pathogenesis of bronchial airway pollution in children (Ghosh R, 2016). ). Other causes include: allergies, chronic aspiration or gastroesophageal reflux disease, fungal infectionEpidemiology of BronchitisData presented in the summary of the National Outpatient Care Survey of 1991 revealed that 2 774 000 visits to children under 15 diagnosed with bronchitis (US Department of Health and Social Services, 1994). Since 1996, 9-14 million Americans have been diagnosed with chronic bronchitis each year. Bronchitis, both acute and chronic, is widespread throughout the world and is one of the top five reasons for visiting doctors in children. The incidence of bronchitis among British schoolchildren would be 20.7%. An overall increase in hospital stays for the lower respiratory tract infection among German children from 1996 to 2000 is consistent with the observations of children from the United States, the United Kingdom and Sweden (Weigl, 2005). The incidence rate of bronchitis in children in this German cohort was 28%. Differences in population prevalence were noted in patients with chronic bronchitis. The incidence of acute bronchitis is the same in men and women. The impact of chronic bronchitis is difficult to pinpoint because of the lack of definitive diagnostic criteria and significant overlap with asthma. However, in recent years, the prevalence of chronic bronchitis has been reported to be consistently higher in women than in men (MeiLan K. Han, 2007). Acute (usually wheezing) bronchitis most commonly occurs in children under two years, with another peak observed in children aged 9 to 15 years. The effects of chronic bronchitis are more common in people over the age of 45 (AlexisFerré, 2012).Pathology of BronchitisAcute bronchitis is usually caused by a viral infection. Syncytial respiratory, influenza and coronavirus viruses are the most common causes in patients less than one-year-old (John S. Tregoning, 2010). In patients aged 1 to 10, the influenza virus, viruses, syncytial respiratory virus and rhinovirus dominate the causes of acute bronchitis. Patients over the age of 10 have the most common reasons of the influenza virus, syncytial respiratory illness, and adenovirus (John S. Tregoning, 2010). Acute bronchitis was first described as inflammation of the bronchial mucous membranes. Among the complex events leading to the disease is an infectious or non-infectious trigger. This leads to a lesion of the bronchial epithelium, which leads to an inflammatory reaction with hyperreactivity of the respiratory tract and mucus production (B Moldoveanu, 2009). The repair of the bronchial wall takes several weeks. The patient will always cough during these weeks. Half of the patients with acute bronchitis will continue to cough for more than two weeks, and in a quarter of the patients, it will take more than a month (Michael D Shields, 2013). Chronic bronchitis in children may be the result of excessive inflammation or continuous exposure to allergens or irritants. This leads to bronchospasm and cough. Later, the respiratory tract will be inflamed with oedema and it is a phlegm production. This mucus production can accumulate, which covers the bronchial tubes, and in turn obstructs the bronchioles (Christopher M. Evans, 2010).Treatment and Patient CareRespiratory tract infections in diabetics are associated with increased mortality. People with diabetes are four times more likely to die from pneumonia or flu than non-diabetic people (Juliana Casqueiro, 2012). If a person with diabetes has a cough and cold that lasts for more than a week, chronically high blood sugar levels can lead to other complications such as ketoacidosis, where too much acid accumulates in the blood. It is even more critical for people with diabetes to cope with both their cold and cough symptoms without waiting for them to disappear (Steele, 2014). Like all pharmaceutical formulations, over-the-counter cough syrups contain some active ingredients and some inactive materials that help to give a tasty and cosmetic product. Active and Inactive Ingredients in Classic Cough Syrup can potentially affect blood sugar levels or other critical functions in a diabetic patient. Sugar is the primary inactive ingredient in most cough syrups and, when absorbed in the blood, directly causes a significant increase in blood sugar. Alcohol consumption can lead to diabetic complications. While many cough syrups also contain alcohol, it can also affect the body’s metabolic pathways to raise blood sugar levels. When it comes to active ingredients in cough syrup, the drugs commonly used are dextromethorphan and guaifenesin; These two are considered safe for people with diabetes at prescribed doses. However, most cough syrup can also help other medications like acetaminophen and ibuprofen to relieve pain – these two drugs can have toxic effects on people with diabetes who have kidney complications (Jan Marquard, 2015). Also, ibuprofen also tends to increase the glycemic impact of anti-diabetic medications (HÖRL, 2010). Decongestants and antihistamines in cough syrup can also interfere with the way the body metabolises sugar, insulin and anti-diabetic medicines in people with diabetes. Conventional sugar-based cough lozenges are also prohibited for people with diabetes. Honey-containing herbal pellets may also affect blood glucose levels (Michael Malone, 2017). Pharmacists can help patients with diabetes by informing you about the availability of these specialised coughs and cold products and guiding them to the appropriate range of over-the-counter products. Before recommending the use of over-the-counter outcomes for people with diabetes, pharmacists must review the history of allergy and patient history and the drug profile to prevent drug interactions and contraindications, and consider whether self-medication is appropriate. In addition, pharmacists should always advise patients on the correct use of these products and remind patients to always follow and avoid the manufacturer’s instructions and warnings on the product label. Use of medicines containing sugar or alcohol, if possible. It is essential that pharmacists remind patients that the use of certain medications can affect your blood sugar levels (Shah, 2010). For example, the use of a decongestant, such as pseudoephedrine, should be used with caution in diabetic patients as it may increase blood sugar. Non-pharmacological measures that can alleviate the discomfort of symptoms associated with a cough or cold, such as the use of vaporisers or humidifiers, rest, adequate hydration and relief of congestion may also be suggested as an alternative (Katherine A. Safka, 2015).ReferencesAdinortey, M., 2017. Biochemicophysiological Mechanisms Underlying Signs. Advances in Biological Research, 11(5), pp. 233-241.Aggarwal, I., 2015. The Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 7(11), pp. 1-2.AlexisFerré, C. F. M. Z. C. C. A. V. G. H. M.-C. D. N. R., 2012. Chronic bronchitis in the general population: Influence of age, gender and socio-economic conditions. Respiratory Medicine, 106(3), pp. 467-471.Anton Y. Peleg, T. W. T. M. E. D. J. S. M., 2006. Common infections in diabetes: pathogenesis, management and relationship to glycaemic control. Diabetes Metabolism: Research and Review, 23(1), pp. 3-13.Atkinson, M. A., 2012. The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Type 1 Diabetes. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med, 2(11).B Moldoveanu, P. O. P. J. J. W. X. S. J. G. M. S. J. Y., 2009. Inflammatory mechanisms in the lung. J Inflamm Res, Volume 2, pp. 1-11.Brandt, M., 1999. Starvation and Diabetes Mellitus. In: Endocrine. S .l.: Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, pp. 71-88.Brieu N, G. G. R. M. S. M. F. V., 2008. Human bocavirus infection in children with respiratory tract disease. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 27(11), pp. 969-973.Brodzinski H, R. R., 2009. Review of new and newly discovered respiratory tract viruses in children. Pediatr Emerg Care, 25(5), pp. 361-363.C. M. Fletcher, P. C. E. A. S. F. C. H. W., 1959. The significance of Respiratory Symptoms and the Diagnosis of Chronic Bronchitis in a Working Population. Br Med J, 2(5147), pp. 257-266.CC Horner, L. B., 2009. Diagnosis and management of asthma in preschool and school-age children: focus on the 2007 NAEPP Guidelines. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 15(1), pp. 52-56.CC, P., 2009. Incidence trends for childhood type 1 diabetes in Europe during 1989–2003 and predicted new cases 2005–20. Lancet, 373(9680), pp. 2027-2033.Christophe M. Filippi, M. G. v. H., 2008. Viral Trigger for Type 1 Diabetes: Pros and Cons. Diabetes, 57(11), pp. 2863-2871.Christopher M. Evans, K. K. M. J. T. B. F. D., 2010. Mucus hypersecretion in asthma: causes and effects. Curr Opin Pulm Med, 15(1), pp. 4-11.Chunguang Chen, C. M. C. J. S. R. B. S. S., 2017. Human beta cell mass and function in diabetes: Recent advances in knowledge and technologies to understand disease pathogenesis. Mol Metab, 6(9), pp. 943-957.Deirdre Donnelly, A. C. M. L. E., 2007. Outcomes in children treated for persistent bacterial bronchitis. Thorax, 62(1), pp. 80-84.EAM, G., 2005. Spring harvest? Reflections on the rise in type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia, Volume 2445-2450, p. 48.Field, L., 2002. Genetic linkage and assicuauib studies of Type 1 diabetes: challenges and rewards. Diabetologia, Volume 45, pp. 21-35.G Mendola, R. C. R. G., 1989. Effect of nicotinamide therapy upon B-cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetics. Diabetologia, Volume 32, pp. 160-162.Gale EAM, G. K., 2001. Diabetes and gender. Diabetologia , Volume 44, pp. 3-15.Ghosh R, R. P. H. K. D. M. S. R. H.-P. I., 2016. Air pollution and childhood bronchitis: Interaction with xenobiotic, immune regulatory and DNA repair genes. Environ Int., Volume 87, pp. 94-100.Gottlieb, S., 2000. Early exposure to cows’ milk raises the risk of diabetes in high-risk children. BMJ, 321(7268), p. 1040.Hermann, R., 2003. Temporal changes in the frequencies of HLA genotypes in type 1 diabetes – an indication of an increased environmental pressure?. Diabetologia, Volume 2003, pp. 420-425.Hörl, W. H., 2010. Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and the Kidney. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 3(7), pp. 2291-2321.J Andrew Woods, J. S. W. C. K. F. N. A. P., 2014. Corticosteroids in the treatment of acute exacerbations of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis, Volume 9, pp. 421-430.Jan Marquard, S. O. A. W. A. S. A. F. J. E. D. H. O. K. M. S. K. A. S. S. W. L. P. M. K. J. F. B. T. F. S., 2015. Characterization of pancreatic NMDA receptors as possible drug targets for diabetes treatment. Nature Medicine, Volume 21, pp. 363-372.Jarosz, P. C., 2011. The rapid increase in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in Polish children from 1989 to 2004, and predictions for 2010 to 2025. Diabetologia, Volume 54, pp. 508-515.John S. Tregoning, J. S., 2010. Respiratory Viral Infections in Infants: Causes, Clinical Symptoms, Virology, and Immunology. Clin Microbiol Rev, 23(1), pp. 74-98.Juliana Casqueiro, J. C. C. A., 2012. Infections in patients with diabetes mellitus: A review of pathogenesis. Indian J Endocrinol Metab, 16(1), pp. 27-36.Kamal AS Al-Shoumer, T. M. A.-E., 2015. Is there a relationship between vitamin D with insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus?. World J Diabetes, 6(8), pp. 1057-1064.Karvonen, M., 1997. Sex differences in the incidence of insulin-dependent diabetes an analysis of the recent epidemiological data. Diabetes Metab Rev, Volume 13, pp. 275-291.Katherine A. Safka, R. A. M., 2015. Non-Pharmacological Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Ulster Med J., 84(1), pp. 13-21.Koehoorn M, K. C. D. P. L. C. T. L. B. M., 2008. Descriptive epidemiological features of bronchiolitis in a population-based cohort. Pediatrics, 122(6), pp. 1196-1203.Laffel, L., 1999. Ketone bodies: a review of physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev, 15(6), pp. 412-426.Massachusetts General Hospital, 2017. “Potential mechanism for BCG vaccine reversal of type 1 diabetes. Massachusetts, Science Daily.McConnell R, B. K. G. F. M. J. T. D. L. F., 2003. A prospective study of air pollution and bronchitic symptoms in children with asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 168(7), pp. 790-797.McCulloch DK, P. J., 1991. The appropriate use of B-cell function testing in the preclinical period of type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med, 8(9), p. 800.MeiLan K. Han, 1. D. P. D. M. M. N. D. G. S. B. J. L. C. F. J. M., 2007. Gender and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 176(12), p. 1179–1184.Michael D Shields, S. T., 2013. The problematic coughing child: prolonged acute cough in children. A cough, 9(11).Michael Malone, T. M. K., 2017. Review: Side Effects of Some Commonly Used Allergy Medications (Decongestants, Anti-Leukotriene Agents, Antihistamines, Steroids, and Zinc) and Their Safety in Pregnancy. International Journal of Allergy Medications, 3(1), p. 24.Miron D, S. I. K.-O. Z. K. Y. W. D. A. I., 2010. Sole pathogen in acute bronchiolitis: is there a role for other organisms apart from the respiratory syncytial virus. Pediatr Infect Dis J, 29(1), pp. E7-E10.ML Barnett, J. L., 2014. Antibiotic prescribing for adults with acute bronchitis in the United States 1996-2010. JAMA, 311(19), pp. 2020-2022.Molly M. Lamb, B. F. J. A. S. M. K. M. R. J. M. N., 2015. Sugar intake is associated with progression from islet autoimmunity to type 1 diabetes: the Diabetes Autoimmunity Study in the Young. Diabetologia, 58(9), pp. 2027-2034.Molly M. Lamb, X. Y. K. B. M. R. H. A. E. B. G. S. E. M. R. J. M. N., 2008. Dietary Glycemic Index, Development of Islet Autoimmunity, and Subsequent Progression to Type 1 Diabetes in Young Children. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 93(10), pp. 3936-3942.Pagliuca, F. et al., 2014. Generation of functional human pancreatic β cells in vitro. Cell, 159(2), pp. 428-439.Poddar, T., 2001. Increasing incidence of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes in three Baltic countries and Finland 1983-1998. Diabetologia, Volume 44, pp. 17-20.Purushothama V. Dasaraju, C. L., 196. Infections of the Respiratory System. In: S. Baron, ed. Medical Microbiology. Galveston, TX: University of Texas Medical Branch.Rubin, B. K., 2014. Secretion properties, clearance, and therapy in airway disease. Transl Respir Med, Volume 2, p. 6.Rui, L., 2014. Energy Metabolism in the Liver. Compr Physiol, 4(1), pp. 177-197.Schildgen O, M. A. A. T. M. I. V. S. K. B., 2008. Human bocavirus: passenger or pathogen in acute respiratory tract infections. Clin Microbiol Rev, 21(2), pp. 291-304.Shah, A., 2010. Pharmacy Intervention in the Medication-use Process, Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Song, S., 2000. Direct measurement of pulsatile insulin secretion from the portal vein in human subjects. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, Volume 85, pp. 4491-4499.Steele, A., 2014. Prevalence of vascular complications among patients with glucokinase mutations among prolonged, mild hyperglycemia. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(3), p. 279.Stratton KR, H. C. J. R. J., 1994. Adverse events associated with childhood vaccines other than pertussis and rubella. Summary of a report from the Institute of Medicine. JAMA, 271(20), pp. 1602-1605.Tsai CH, H. J. H. B. L. Y., 2010. Household environmental tobacco smoke and risks of asthma, wheeze and bronchitic symptoms among children in Taiwan. Respir Res, Volume 11, p. 11.US Department of Health and Human Services, 1994. Vital and Health Statistics. National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1991 Summary, s.l.: DHHS Publication.Victor Kim, G. J. C., 2013. Chronic Bronchitis and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 187(3), pp. 228-237.Voynow JA, R. B., 2009. Mucins, mucus, and sputum. cHEST, 135(2), pp. 505-512.Weigl JA, P. W. B. O. N. J. B. F. S. H., 2005. The descriptive epidemiology of severe lower respiratory tract infections in children in Kiel, Germany. Klin Paediatr, 217(5), pp. 259-267.Wilcox, G., 2005. Insulin and Insulin Resistance. Clin Biochem Rev, 26(2), pp. 19-39.Worrall, G., 2008. Acute bronchitis. Can Fam Physician, 54(2), pp. 238-239.