The Incident Command System (ICS)

Published: 2021-07-07 00:14:12
essay essay

Category: Human Resource Man

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Developed in 1970 after the Southern California Wildfires, the Incident Command System (ICS) was formed to answer the question “Who is in charge” of the overall response and rescue effort. Before its development, duplication of roles, inadequate coordination, and communication slowed down response as in the case of the fires in Southern California in 1970. ICS’s major function is to create a set of management and planning structure that would assist the agencies responding to a disaster work in an organized approach (Cole, 2000). This, in turn, enables effective use of resources and personnel at their disposal. In this discussion, the events of the Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster as case study illustrates the challenges in responding to a big disaster event and the role of Incident Command System.After 28 successful space flights, the Space Shuttle Columbia STS-107 reentered earth on February 1, 2003. It carried seven astronauts, including Rick D. Husband, who was the commander. The flight had earlier been postponed a record thirteen times. When the shuttle lifted off, at last, ground control crews started noticing problems in several parts of the left wing in addition to the communication problems with the crew. A very loud explosion was heard, a signal that the shuttle was coming down. The ruins of the shuttle poured debris covering large miles across Western Louisiana and East Texas.On assessing the situation with both FEMA and DHS officials, U.S President George Bush ordered emergency declarations over the two affected states. The disaster declaration, according to the Stafford Act, approved Federal Emergency Management Agency to manage federal support and all the resources used by responders in the disaster. This was led by FEMA’s deputy director who considered the mission a “search, find and secure’ task. Their work was major to ensure public safety, recover pieces of the shuttle and also compensate expenses of government and ordinary citizens who sustained damage to property as result of the crash (Cromp, 2011). The Environment Protection Agency (EPA) also worked with both the local authorities and the state to secure public places (Schools, parks, campuses). EPA used the resources of Emergency Response and Removal Services (ERRS) and U.S. Coast Guard (USCG) to test the water and air samples to ensure their safety. The teams from NASA, National Guard, the Department of Public Safety, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and others carried out a successful search and recovered the bodies of the shuttle’s crew. About sixty agencies, including private groups, responded swiftly with personnel, equipment, and various supplies.By the 3rd day of February, FEMA had formed a Joint Information Center (JIC) in Lufkin, TX located at the Lufkin Civic Center. This center served as the dissemination point for public information. The center consisted of representatives from the U.S. Red Cross, NASA, FEMA, and The U.S. Coast Guard among others. By March 1st, there were slightly above 5,200 Federal and State personnel working harmoniously day and night on the response. The operation looked smooth and well-coordinated. Later on April 30, FEMA officially announced it’s handing over to NASA, about three months after the disaster. FEMA had covered over 85% of land search and 93% of assigned air operation arrears with it having concluded all water search operations.In conclusion, the Space Shuttle Colombia Disaster can be described as a single utmost mobilization of civil servants in the history of The U.S. There were just seven primary fatalities, there were no injuries recorded and destruction on the property was minimal. This was a success story of an Incident Command System (ICS).ReferencesCromp, R. F., & Suberri, G. (2011). U.S. Patent o. 7,996,465. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.Cole, D. (2000). The incident command system: A 25-year evaluation by California practitioners. Emmitsburg, MD: National Fire Academy.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read