What is your Worldview?

Published: 2021-07-06 23:12:27
essay essay

Category: English

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Each person in order to exist in this world builds his worldview consciously or unconsciously on the basis of his experience and all the mass of information that he has. It’s just necessary to live and act in peace. Even a newborn baby has his own worldview, feeling his world in the form of color, sounds, smells and breast feeding his mother’s breast. With the accumulation of knowledge and experience, the idea of ​​the World in man must inevitably change. In addition, a person builds his worldview in such a way that he could live in this world as comfortable as possible. How is the World? Is there a God? Who is a Man? Where and why in this World? These questions inevitably arise in every person. And everyone answers them always, without even giving himself a report.In my childhood I did not think about these questions. But it was at that time. There was a spontaneous experience, which I could much later call an enlightenment or sensation, an experience of the fact that the world has more dimensions than we can see at the physical level. Express it in words it is impossible. After some emotional shock, I experienced an extraordinary emotional uplift, flash, illumination, a feeling of extraordinary unity with the whole world, bliss, happiness of such heat, on the verge of pain, it is simply impossible to sustain more. In addition, there was a feeling of extraordinary wisdom, knowledge, as if I could easily find an answer to any question and this would be true. The happiness was so great that it was poured out with abundant tears. Once again I repeat that it is impossible to convey this in words. This is the most vivid experience of my whole life. There were other experiences, but this one is the brightest. He then covered my whole life.Interest in religion and worldview issues arose by the end of my 30-ies. Purely materialistic explanation of the world rejected rather for aesthetic reasons. Such a world is too flat and uninteresting, for me at least. And it was already an intuitive premonition that the world is more complicated and interesting than we were taught. Of course, interest arose primarily in Christianity, since there was no particular choice. It is appropriate to recall my childhood experience when my grandmother took me to church when I was five. Impressions then were oppressive. Dark, gloomy room, stuffy air with unpleasant smells, mournful incomprehensible singing.The impression was heightened by alcohol – my grandmother communicated me. So, in maturity an interest in Christianity arose and I neglected the negative child experience. The interest was quite positive. I begin to read Christian books, primary sources first of all, that is, the Bible, the Veti and the New Testament, and the interpretations too. The general impression is that what is true is trivial (like commandments), and very much is simply unacceptable, requires complex explanations and interpretations, or is generally immoral, as in many Bible texts. How to understand the story of the creation of the world? Literally – elementary logic and common sense do not allow, interpretations and interpretations remain. This is not the original source. And where is the main, true, essence? In general, at this stage I read a lot of the holy scriptures and their interpretations. There was such impression, that I remove a skin behind a skin, all peel in search of a grain of true. And I do not find it. There are no satisfactory answers to many questions.The process of creation, described in the Bible – can only be interpreted as an allegory. But nevertheless the goal remains a mystery. And here lies the meaning of human life.It is not clear why Christianity removes from the Creator responsibility for evil in this world. If God is omniscient, he must have known that man will eat the fruit of knowing good and evil. If he is not omniscient, then consequently he is imperfect. And anyway, how can you be moral without knowledge of good and evil? Or only in obedience virtue? So what then is the sin of the first people?Why should I, I, be responsible for the sin of the first people? Why should my children suffer by atoning others’ sins? This is incomprehensible, unfair and illogical.Again the question rests on the meaning of human life and the meaning of life in general. There is no convincing answer. Rather, the answer lies in the very behavior of the founder of Christianity, who was not a family man, not a father, but a barren loner. No need for children in Christianity. Moreover, their conception is declared sinful and vicious. How to explain the blatant vampirism and immorality of God in the Old Testament? The examples described in the Old Testament are darkness! And many more specific questions, on which Christianity does not give satisfactory answers.Then she became interested in other religious systems. It turned out that in those systems that recognize reincarnation there is a much more convincing interpretation of a person’s life and his suffering. Especially the suffering of innocent babies who did not have time to warm up. Sins can not be molested and repent of them – they need to be redeemed, to survive all the suffering that a person has not even delivered to another person, but simply a living being. This system answers already many questions to which Christianity responds with mossy dogmas, completely inconclusive, illogical and often immoral. Followers of these religions are much more strict than Christians in everyday life. In our life, as an example, we can bring Hare Krishnas. But this is someone else’s system! Do we have our own … Christianity? Is it his own?And then came an interest in his own pre-Christian faith. And then the information flooded the stream, the sensations were inexpressible. It is mine! As if the space was opened wide and filled with joy, light and meaning. The soul sang from finding my native space, joy came into my life. As if the back straightened and his hands threw themselves to the sky in a gesture of gratitude and love. There were answers to those questions that Christianity could not answer. A huge field of information opened, from which I can choose the one I need. It turns out that the information was always open, it was in folk tales, proverbs and sayings, words and grammatical constructions of the Russian language, and most importantly – in my soul. Only it was blocked until then.What attracted me so much in paganism in comparison with Christianity. A holistic view of the world, based on the laws of Nature, including the laws of the subtle, spiritual world. Morality arising from these laws. Natural morality, conscience in the soul, and not out of the cane of God’s punishment. Own feeling of dignity and value, as part of this beautiful world and part of the Rod. There was a sense of responsibility for their lives and for their kind and people. A living sense of responsibility for your people. What blocked Christianity with its dogma of personal salvation.Strictly speaking, I am an agnostic. I do not know if there is a God. And no one knows, or rather there is no evidence of either his existence or his absence. So this is a matter of faith, or rather, the choice. A world without God, without a Sensible beginning, random, I do not like. So I select for myself the world with God and what is he – my God and my World? After all, this too each represents in different ways and this difference is very significant!I think that if God is, then he is all exists, the whole World, the cosmos, all the manifested and unmanifested beings. And then such a God has no name, can not be personal, can not have any qualities, for He is everything. There is nothing except God, which manifests itself in a sequence of subtle worlds down to ours, physical, creating and living the whole diverse experience of the life of all beings. Thus, man is the god of the manifested world, who during many lives knows a diverse experience, learns to control himself and the world, creates reality with his thoughts and desires. He plays and enjoys his games! And what else can God do, if apart from him there is no one else and nothing in this world?There are good analogies to this. For example, computer games in which you can choose a character, give it a quality, and then build up its power by moving from level to level. Our personality is such a character, a mask, a mask. A set of qualities that allows you to lose some roles. And here it is important not to play, not to get too carried away by playing, identifying yourself, your divine essence, with the mask, the character, the Ego. As someone wise said – “Remembering the eternity and following your desires you will find the Way”.I still like this model. Our center, the core, is a divine entity that radiates the pure light of consciousness as a projector. An empty blank screen is Peace. And the human person, the ego is the filter, the glasses through which the light of the projector pours out onto the screen, forming images, events and the very course of life. And all we can do in this life is to clean our glasses of dirt and change the color filters.She took off her rose-colored glasses. I put on black. I put on blue things. Shine! The world sparkled with ice crystals, but cold. I put on green, that is it! Even better pink. Although too harmonious – it becomes boring. I want to try gold, but they are not. They still have to be earned and without glasses in general there is no picture and yet, the experience of Enlightenment gives the realization that Emptiness is the Unity of Jehovah and the opportunity to play divine games exactly as God intended. I built it with the help of Teachers, who are infinitely grateful. These are my parents and teachers, the authors of my favorite books and all the people I met in my life.Works CitedBloom, Paul. “Religion, Morality, Evolution.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 63, no. 1, 2012, pp. 179–99, doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100334.Janoff-Bulman, Ronnie, et al. “Proscriptive Versus Prescriptive Morality: Two Faces of Moral Regulation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 96, no. 3, 2009, pp. 521–37, doi:10.1037/a0013779.

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read